California Expungement
Expungement: Process by which record of criminal conviction is destroyed or sealed after the expiration of time.
Review and Compare California's top record-clearing law firms.
California has many one of the best expungement laws in California. Almost anyone who completes probation can have their record expunged in California. Felony offenses that ended in parole o or state prison are not eligible for expungement in California.
Once expunged (dismissed) you can honestly say you do not have a conviction when apply for any job.
With 80 percent of employers performing background checks, spending a few hundred dollars on record clearing will pay a lifetime of dividends in a better job and higher earnings. Plus, record clearing can help put past mistakes in the past where they belong.
When considering an expungement attorney, there are many factors to consdier:
Click to see a direct comparison of some of the best expungement lawyers in California. The chart compares their costs, experience, and guarantees; so you can find the best deal on putting the past behind you.
Click to see a direct comparison of some of the best expungement attorney's in California. The chart compares their costs, experience, and guarantees.
Using an attorney who specializes in expungement increases the chances that your case will be expunged faster and usually for less money.
California attorneys who specialize in expungement know how to get things done faster and right the first time. This usually means that they can expunge your record for less money than the typical attorney.
IMPORTANT. Do not let anyone but a licensed attorney give you advice or charge you to expunge your record. Expungement is an adversarial court process that can have a lifelong affect. It also involves your confidential information. Trust only a licensed attorney who is regulated by the state.
For California, DUIs do not appear to be crimes of "moral turpitude" for
purposes of juvy record sealing...
In In re Carr, 46 Cal.3d 1089 (Cal. 1988), the defendant (an attorney)
pleaded guilty to two separate counts of driving under the influence under
Vehicle Code § 23152(a). Id. at 1090. Both the California State Bar and
the California Supreme Court concluded that his convictions, both
misdemeanors, together did not rise to the level of ?moral turpitude.? Id.
at 1090-91.
In People v. Pinkins, 223 Cal.App.3d 69A (1990), the Court of Appeal
indicated that ?[d]runk driving and being under the influence of drugs or
possession of drugs do not appear to meet? the ?moral turpitude? standard
enunciated in Castro. See also In re Kelley, 52 Cal.3d 487, 494 (Cal.
1990)(?Convictions for drunk driving . . . do not per se establish moral
turpitude.?).
In People v. Forster, 29 Cal.App.4th 1746 (1994), the Court of Appeal found
that a conviction for driving under the influence did rise to the level of
?moral turpitude?; however, that was only because it was dealing with a
?recidivist type crime.? Id. at 1757-58. In fact, the Forster court
specifically distinguished between a misdemeanor DUI and felony DUI where
the defendant had three prior convictions for driving under the influence.
Id.